ISO 26143:2021 空间数据和信息传输系统 空间链路扩展（SLE） 回程操作控制场业务

标准编号：ISO 26143:2021

中文名称：空间数据和信息传输系统 空间链路扩展（SLE） 回程操作控制场业务

英文名称：Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Return operational control fields service specification

发布日期：2021-06

标准范围

本文件的目的是根据SLE参考模型（参考文献[1]）定义空间链路扩展（SLE）返回操作控制字段（ROCF）服务。？ROCF服务是一种SLE传输服务，它从一个主通道或一个虚拟通道向任务用户传送所有操作控制字段。本文档以抽象的方式根据以下方面定义了ROCF服务:提供服务所需的操作；与每个操作相关联的参数数据；调用每个操作所产生的行为；和操作和结果行为之间的关系和有效序列。它没有具体说明:单个实现或产品；实体或接口在真实系统中的实现；从从航天器接收的信号中获取遥测帧所需的方法或技术；为通信提供合适环境所需的方法或技术；或调度、配置和控制ROCF服务所需的管理活动。笔记？–？参考文献[1]将返回主信道操作控制字段(Rtn MC-OCF)服务和返回虚拟信道操作控制字段(Rtn VC-OCF)服务定义为两个不同的服务。随后的研究表明，最好定义一个提供两者功能的服务。这里定义的ROCF服务就是这样做的。预计未来的参考文献[1]将采取相同的方法，删除Rtn MC-OCF和Rtn VC-OCF服务，并用Rtn OCF服务代替它们。

The purpose of this document is to define the Space Link Extension (SLE) Return Operational Control Fields (ROCF) service in conformance with the SLE Reference Model (reference [1]).  The ROCF service is an SLE transfer service that delivers to a mission user all operational control fields from one master channel or one virtual channel.This document defines, in an abstract manner, the ROCF service in terms of:

1. the operations necessary to provide the service;
2. the parameter data associated with each operation;
3. the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and
4. the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors.

It does not specify:

1. individual implementations or products;
2. the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems;
3. the methods or technologies required to acquire telemetry frames from signals received from a spacecraft;
4. the methods or technologies required to provide a suitable environment for communications; or
5. the management activities required to schedule, configure, and control the ROCF service.

NOTE   –    Reference [1] defines the Return Master Channel Operational Control Field (Rtn MC-OCF) service and the Return Virtual Channel Operational Control Field (Rtn VC-OCF) service as two distinct services. Subsequent study has indicated that it is preferable to define one service that provides the functionality of both. The ROCF service defined here does just that. It is anticipated that a future issue of reference [1] will take the same approach, deleting the Rtn MC-OCF and Rtn VC-OCF services and replacing them with the Rtn OCF service.

标准预览图